Skip to main content
CARD ISSUING Build a card program for any use case — and approve every authorization in real time. See how →

Fyatu vs Reap

Reap is a Visa Principal Issuer with 2M+ cards issued. Fyatu issues instantly on both networks across 180+ countries, with five card types and a published price.

Fyatu

Instant Card Issuing

VS
Reap

Corporate Cards + Stablecoin

01 — DETAILED COMPARISON

Fyatu vs Reap: Feature Comparison

Comparing card issuing infrastructure and flexibility between the Fyatu API and the Reap card platform.

Headquarters

Fyatu

Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Reap

Hong Kong

Founded

Fyatu

2020

Reap

2018

Regulatory framework

Fyatu

Not a bank; issues through licensed partner institutions

Reap

Visa Principal Issuer; licensed in Hong Kong and Mexico

Time to launch

Fyatu

Cards instantly; live programme in 1–3 weeks

Reap

Not published

Primary use case

Fyatu

Full card-as-a-service API — any card program architecture

Reap

Corporate expense card management — B2B focus

Funding model

Fyatu

Prefunded programme balance, in fiat or stablecoin

Reap

Stablecoin-funded card programmes

Geographic coverage

Fyatu

180+ countries

Reap

100+ markets; licensed in Hong Kong and Mexico

API programmability

Fyatu

Full programmatic control — card lifecycle, webhooks, limits, controls

Reap

Dashboard-driven managed platform with API access

Blockchain dependency

Fyatu

None — REST API and HTTPS webhooks

Reap

Ethereum USDC integration for funding flows

Crypto card use cases

Fyatu

Yes — any ledger-backed balance, off-chain

Reap

Yes — USDC-funded corporate cards

Card networks

Fyatu

Visa & Mastercard

Reap

Visa — Reap is a Visa Principal Issuer

Stablecoin exposure

Fyatu

None — fiat settlement, stablecoin stays in your ledger

Reap

USDC on Ethereum backs the card balance pool

Track record

Fyatu

Newer platform, no public volume figures

Reap

2M+ cards issued; backed by Payward

Physical card support

Fyatu

Yes — virtual and physical

Reap

Visa virtual cards; physical availability varies

A tick marks the side the published evidence favours. Rows where neither leads are left unmarked. Read from each company’s own site and developer documentation.

02 — AT A GLANCE

Two approaches. One fundamental architectural difference.

Fyatu
Instant Card Issuing

Global card issuing API. Both networks. Published pricing.

  • Five card types including credit, with billing cycles and statements
  • API-first: full programmatic control over every card
  • 180+ countries — LATAM, MENA, Asia, Eastern Europe
  • Visa & Mastercard virtual and physical cards
  • Per-transaction webhook authorization with custom logic
  • No blockchain dependency — REST API only
Reap Corporate Cards + Stablecoin

Business expense cards with USDC payment rails, focused on Hong Kong and Asia.

  • Established corporate card platform in HK fintech ecosystem
  • Expense management UX included — minimal integration required
  • USDC on Ethereum for funding — native to crypto-holding businesses
  • Visa-backed virtual and physical corporate cards
  • Dashboard-driven expense management for business teams
  • Focused on Asia-Pacific corporate card programs

03 — WHERE FYATU IS STRONGER

Fyatu and Reap: different architectures

What distinguishes Fyatu's infrastructure for modern card programs.

01

Full CaaS API — not just corporate cards

Reap is purpose-built for corporate expense management — a focused product for a specific use case. Fyatu is a card-as-a-service API that enables any card program architecture: consumer wallets, neobank cards, crypto-funded programs, expense cards, loyalty cards, or prepaid programs. The full card lifecycle — issuance, loading, controls, lifecycle management — is exposed via API.

02

Global coverage beyond Asia-Pacific

Reap's core strength is Hong Kong and Singapore, with selective expansion across Asia-Pacific. Fyatu covers 180+ countries — including LATAM, MENA, and Eastern Europe — markets where cards-as-a-service infrastructure is in high demand. For international fintechs, Fyatu provides a single global contract.

03

No Ethereum dependency

Reap's funding rail is USDC on Ethereum — a natural fit for businesses already operating with on-chain infrastructure. Fyatu takes a different approach: HTTPS webhooks, REST API, fiat settlement. No wallet management, no gas fee exposure, no Ethereum dependency. For card programs that want to keep their infrastructure off-chain, Fyatu is the right choice.

04

Real-time authorization control

Fyatu fires a webhook to your backend at every card authorization before settlement — giving you real-time control to approve, decline, or modify any transaction based on live business logic. Reap's model is dashboard-managed with pre-defined expense policies, which works well for teams that want a managed product rather than a fully programmable authorization layer.

04 — WHERE REAP IS STRONGER

Where Reap is the better answer

There are programmes we would not win, and pretending otherwise would not help you choose. These are the cases where Reap is the stronger option.

A Visa Principal Issuer in its own right

Reap issues directly as a Visa Principal Member rather than through a sponsor, and became one in Mexico as well as Hong Kong. That removes a layer between the programme and the network, with the pricing and roadmap consequences that follow. Fyatu issues through licensed partner institutions, so on this row Reap is simply ahead.

Scale and institutional backing

More than two million cards issued since 2018, licences in Hong Kong and Mexico, and backing from Payward. Fyatu publishes no comparable volume figure. For a programme where the provider is itself part of the risk assessment, that record does work no feature list can.

Built for stablecoin settlement first

Reap describes itself as the first crypto credit card issuer and runs stablecoin settlement as the core of the platform across 100+ markets. If on-chain settlement is the point of your product rather than an implementation detail, that focus is the reason to choose them.

05 — HONEST VERDICT

Who should choose what?

An honest breakdown to help you make the right decision for your card program.

Fyatu

Choose Fyatu if…

LEADS 8/14

Where the published evidence favours Fyatu

  • You're building a card program (not just managing corporate expenses) — neobank, fintech, crypto card, prepaid
  • You need global coverage beyond Asia-Pacific
  • Your engineering team needs a fully programmable API with per-transaction webhook authorization
  • You need coverage beyond the markets Reap is licensed in
  • You want both Visa and Mastercard, not just Visa
Reap

Choose Reap if…

LEADS 1/14

Where it favours Reap

  • You're a Hong Kong or Singapore business that needs corporate expense cards with built-in approval workflows and expense management UX
  • USDC on Ethereum is already your payment infrastructure and corporate card issuance is a secondary need
  • You want a managed product with minimal API integration work for internal expense tracking
FAQ

Fyatu vs Reap: FAQ

Common questions about comparing Fyatu and Reap for card issuing.

Skip the 18-Month Bank Negotiation.